AS GOES CALIFORNIA. . . .
A Message from Rochelle
An initiative has been filed for next year's California ballot that seeks to pave the way for the construction of more nuclear power plants in the state. Since 1976, California law has imposed a moratorium on siting any new reactors until a way has been found to permanently and safely store high-level radioactive waste. In the realm of nuclear power politics, this is perhaps the most obvious, common-sense law on the books anywhere in the country or the world. Imagine what the citizens of Japan would give right now to have had a law just like it, long before this summer's seismic portent of very bad things to come for their nation. The nuclear lobby has been unable to meet its simple terms or find a way around it, so now they're hoping to vote it out of existence.
Here’s what's heading for California: A massive ballot initiative campaign that nuclear power is the way and the light and the path to salvation from global warming, so let's just get rid of that silly old law and its unpleasant reminder that we still don't know what to do with all that ultra-toxic waste product, a problem the feds and the nuclear industry has not been able to solve in fifty years of trying and fifty years of promising.
If we buy into this claim, then we will have purchased the Bush administration's Energy Plan, replete with the “sky’s the limit” loan guarantees for nuclear power plants. Even if a utility never generates one watt of power, even if it never finishes construction of a new plant, Uncle Sam's got their back and will load up their corporate accounts with your money. The nuclear utilities have flatly stated that these are the only conditions under which they will agree to undertake the incredibly expensive, high-risk gamble of building more reactors. That measure just passed the Senate and is headed for the House. To voice your opposition to the House following the Senate’s irresponsible decision to spend $40 billion on new nuclear plants call: (202) 224-3121.
So, yes, global warming is a problem that needs to be solved. But more nukes is not any part of the solution. Even if you think they are worth the risk - the waste, spills, quakes, meltdowns, proliferation, terrorist strikes - in the name of fighting global warming, they are not worth the money.
Building nuclear power plants to save us from global warming is like building a pier to save a drowning man. While the pier contractor was arguing his case, you'd have to be thinking that there's a better way, and a faster, cheaper way to solve this urgent problem. And you'd be wondering why you're even listening to this guy. And you'd be right.
The truth is:
- Scientists say we have about ten years to pull back from the brink of global warming's worst impacts. That’s ten years if we're lucky, starting now. The average time to get a nuclear power plant designed, permitted, built and operational is ten years. That's what you call a disqualifier.
- Global warming emissions resulting from electrical generation could be cut by 47 percent right now by implementing improvements in the efficiency of power generation. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf - Footnote 48
- A dollar invested in efficiency displaces almost seven times as much carbon as a dollar invested in nuclear power. Decentralized power + energy efficiency cuts far more greenhouse gas emissions, much faster and cheaper, than nukes. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf - Footnote 86
- Nuclear power is not a “zero emissions” energy source. The mining, milling, processing and transport of uranium is fossil-fuel intensive. More plants will mean more uranium mined, which means a future of lower-grade ore and even higher greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to natural gas-fired power plants. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf - Footnote 27 The entire output of two coal-fired power plants is required to power one uranium enrichment facility in Paducah, Kentucky.
- The phenomenon of “peak oil” is about to meet “peak uranium.” http://www.dougcraftfineart.com/PeakOilandOurFutureEssaybyDougCraft.pdf
- Hey, renewables are great, except when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow, right? This is probably the single favorite line of the nuke promoters, after “nuclear power is a zero emissions energy source,” and it's just as wrong. The International Energy Agency has studied this objection and answered it with the simple solution of mixing energy from different sources: on-site solar photovoltaics, plus wind farms, plus geothermal, different types of power integrated from different locations overcome any concerns about intermittency. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf Footnote 37
- Hey, what about France? The nuke nuts always point proudly to our plucky Gallic friends, their oodles of reactors and their 70% dependency on nuclear power. Less mentioned: The summer of 2006, when a record heat-wave wracked that country, forcing power reductions and reactor shutdowns across France. You can’t operate your nuclear reactor when the cooling water is too warm.
- Global warming has made nuclear utilities, our alleged savior from global warming, and the victim of irony: They will become increasingly unreliable as the water gets warmer. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf - Footnote 32
- About 2,000 new reactors would have to be built worldwide to make a dent in carbon emissions. Do you have a trillion dollars you’re not using? Do you know of a hundred-plus safe, permanent waste repository sites you haven’t told the Department of Energy about? http://a4nr.org/library/nuclearrenaissance/2007.01-
- Nuclear energy received 60 percent of all federal energy R&D funding from 1948 to 1998. Renewables got 10 percent. Energy efficiency got 7 percent. Yes, there’s something wrong with this picture. No, we shouldn't help to perpetuate this formula. http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/Dev/download/FalsePromises.pdf - Footnote 155
California is the nuke lobby's Golden Domino, and if it falls prey to the hype that nuclear power must be part of our efforts to curb global warming, then we have turned out the beacon of a truly sustainable and renewable light that the nation and the world is watching.
We can defeat this ill-conceived initiative. The Alliance has received offers of support from across the state and the country, yet we need to reach out to all of our friends, our families, our co-workers, our religious community; everyone has a stake in this, and if we share this information we will succeed.
We have started a listserve dedicated to defeating the initiative to allow the building of new nuclear power plants in California. This will be an informational listserve for the purpose of educating people about the issue and working to bring people and groups from all over California to work together to stop this initiative. Please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nonewnukesca/ and sign onto this listserve. Together we CAN defeat this initiative.
The Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility needs your help: Please send this message to everyone on your list, give what you can, and stayed tuned for an action alert to write your legislators in the next few weeks regarding this ill-conceived and short-sighted initiative to overturn California's law to protect it citizens from the growing stockpiles of highly radioactive waste in a very seismically active state.
In Peace
Rochelle
"The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth."
-Aldous Huxley
Rochelle Becker, Executive Director Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility
www.a4nr.org
(858) 337 2703
Breaking News
Here's the latest news
-
Conclusions - CEC Draft Report Sept 2008
Read more -
Earthquakes May Endanger New York More Than Thought; Nuclear Power Plant Seen As Particular Risk
A study by a group of prominent seismologists suggests that a pattern of subtle but active faults makes the risk of earthquakes to the New York City area substantially greater than formerly believed. Among other things, they say that the controversial Indian Point nuclear power plants, 24 miles north of the city, sit astride the previously unidentified intersection of two active seismic zones.
Read more -
Progress Energy will ask for rate hike in Florida
Progress Energy Florida will ask the state to approve a 31 percent customer rate hike partly to help pay for two new nuclear power plants. The company said Friday the increase will amount to an extra $34.27 monthly for a user of 1,000 kilowatt hours. If approved by the state Public Service Commission later this year, the hike will take effect in January.
Read more -
Nuclear Shortcuts Exposed In U.S. Nuclear Fuel Facility
US regulators have ignored expert safety advice in an attempt to cut corners and fast track the completion of a $4 billion nuclear fuel facility currently under construction near Aiken, South Carolina.
Read more -
Areva faces 50 pct cost rise for Finnish nuclear reactor
French nuclear group Areva is facing a 50 percent rise to the cost of building the world's first next-generation pressurised water reactor in Finland, the business daily Les Echos reported Thursday. The cost of constructing the plant at Olkiluoto has risen from three billion to 4.5 billion euros (6.7 billion dollars), the paper reported citing an unidentified source.
Read more -
Nuclear plant workers evacuated
Human error is being blamed for a radiation spike at the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant that prompted the evacuation of about a dozen workers from the main reactor building for about two hours.
Read more -
LA Times Letter to the Editor
Read more -
FRANCE'S NUCLEAR CONUNDRUM - Atomic World Champ on the Ropes
France is proud of having the world's most developed nuclear energy infrastructure, but a series of incidents at the Tricastin nuclear power plant has shaken its self-confidence. Is public sentiment about nuclear power about to shift? The winegrowers have already made their move. No longer will they label their product Côteaux du Tricastin. Why? Because the name Tricastin is slowly beginning to stand for something far removed from fine wine.
Read more -
Efficiency, renewable energy are much cheaper than nukes
When Arjun Makhijani talks about generating electricity with nuclear power, he knows of what he speaks. His Ph.D. is from UC-Berkeley in nuclear engineering, and he has authored numerous books on energy, including the first evaluation conducted of energy efficiency potential in the U.S. economy. His most recent tome, “Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free,” is a no-nonsense policy guide for ending our dependence on fossil fuels without incurring massive debt — and courting potential disaster — by expanding our nuclear-generation capacity.
Read more -
The Misconception of Nuclear Power
Read more -
WATER WORRIES GROW
On a hazy summer day, a pair of anglers fish on a man-made lake in PPL’s Susquehanna Riverlands wildlife habitat. Above them, the massive cooling towers of the Susquehanna nuclear plant billow white plumes of vapor, the byproduct of millions of gallons of water the two reactors consume daily from the river to cool the intense heat generated by nuclear fission
Read more -
42-Square-Mile Federal Uranium Program Challenged: Threatens Contamination of Public Land, Wildlife Habitat Communities, and Precious Western Water
A coalition of conservation groups filed suit in federal court today, challenging the Department of Energy’s decision to vastly expand its uranium mining program on 42 square miles of public land near the spectacular Dolores River Canyon, a tributary to the Colorado River in southwest Colorado.
Read more -
ACCIDENTS MAKE NUCLEAR QUESTIONS LOOM LARGE
The recent proliferation of accidents at nuclear power plants in France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia and elsewhere in Europe has made calls for greater reliance on nuclear energy questionable, experts say.
Read more -
'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution
Scientists mimic essence of plants' energy storage system
Read more -
Don’t Drink the Nuclear Kool-Aid
We can't let the nuclear power industry use global warming as an opportunity to sell its insanely expensive and dangerous power plants.
Read more -
France: Nuclear Leak Announced
French nuclear safety authorities and the nuclear giant Areva said that a leak had occurred at one of Areva’s nuclear fuel plants, the second leak at an Areva nuclear power plant in two weeks.
Read more -
NUCLEAR POWER, FRANCE HALTS TRICASTIN POWER STATION
The French nuclear safety agencies have asked the company owned by the Areva Socatri group to temporarily stop operations at the treatment plant for the Tricastin power station is the south of France. On Monday it was discovered that the plants were leaking water which contained Uranium and which was running off into the surrounding rivers.
Read more -
River use banned after French uranium leak
Residents in the Vaucluse, a popular southern French tourist destination, were banned yesterday from drinking well-water or swimming or fishing in two rivers after a uranium leak from one of France's nuclear power plants.
Read more -
Nuclear Recycling Fails the Test
Over the past few years, attention to the recycling of nuclear power spent fuel has grown. Fears of global warming due to fossil fuel burning have given nuclear energy a boost; over the next 15 years dozens of new power reactors are planned world-wide. To promote nuclear energy, the Bush administration is seeking to establish international spent nuclear fuel recycling centers that are supposed to reduce wastes, recycle uranium, and convert nuclear explosive materials, such as plutonium to less troublesome elements in advanced power reactors.
Read more -
NRC Found Lax in Oversight of Fire Safety Regulations at Reactors
A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that reviewed the performance of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in regulating federally-mandated fire protection standards at U.S. nuclear reactors was released this week. The report confirmed that the NRC has for three decades consistently mishandled fire protection violations at the country’s nuclear power plants.
Read more
Recent Articles
Recent articles of interest posted on the ANR website
-
ALERT - ALERT - ALERT - ALERT - ALERT
(This is used on the home page as part of a content panel)
Read more -
DRAFT REPORT & PUBLIC MEETINGS - FALL 2008
Here you will find the draft report, conclusion and links to the public hearings and testimonies.
Read more -
Foreign Nuclear News and Information
The US is not the only country with nuclear power plants. Here you will find information from all over the world regarding nuclear power in places other than the US.
Read more -
Nuclear France - Myths and Fantasies (from Beyond Nuclear)
France gets nearly 80% of its electricity from its 58 reactors. However, such a heavy reliance on nuclear power brings with it many major, unsolved poblems, most especially that of radioactive waste. Despite assertions to the contrary, the French nuclear story is far from a gleaming example of nuclear success. The example, set by the French nuclear infrastructure - and best exemplified by its giant nuclear corporation, Areva, is not to be emulated.
Read more -
AB 1632 Assessment of California's Operating Nuclear Plants - Draft Report
Posted 9/12/08. (Acrobat PDF file, 326 pages, 3.7)
Read more -
Carbon Free Nuclear Free Website
Here is the link for the Carbon Free Nuclear Free Website
Read more -
Uranium Mining, Enrichment & Waste
Read more -
Sign Petition to NRC to Block Yucca Mountain Dump
Background: In early June, the U.S. Dept. of Energy filed a license application with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, seeking permission to construct and operate the still pending high-level radioactive waste dump at Yucca Mountain , Nevada . The NRC will now review and then docket this application, allowing only a small window for any remaining public intervention. Although the DOE application is more than 8,000 pages long with 30 million pages of supporting documents, the NRC contends it will docket the application in three months. Once docketed, a three- to four-year licensing proceeding would commence, ending around 2012, most likely with NRC approval. The culmination of this review comprises the biggest NRC licensing proceeding in history. Our View: NRC is rushing its docketing review in order to launch the Yucca licensing proceeding before George W. Bush and his pro-Yucca Mountain administration exit the White House. But despite its huge size and cost – more than $11 billion to date that will likely balloon to at least $70 billion if the dump is built and operated – the DOE application and document collection is missing the most important pieces. These include: a final repository design; final national transport plan; final design for the "Transport, Aging, and Disposal" canister in which the waste would be “permanently” sealed; final EPA regulations on radiation releases; and meaningful treatment of Western Shoshone Indian land rights at Yucca under the "peace and friendship" Treaty of Ruby Valley signed by the U.S. government in 1863. Consequently, the NRC should not docket the application and should halt the Yucca licensing proceeding. What You Can Do: Follow the link where you will find U.S. Senator Harry Reid's "Petition to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Reject the License Application for a Nuclear Waste Dump at Yucca Mountain ." Please sign it, and circulate it to others for signatures.
Read more
CODE PINK PRESENTS AUTHOR-ACTIVIST DIANE WILSON and SINGER LIZZIE WEST
Conclusions - CEC Draft Report Sept 2008