REDACTED: Art exhibit–Transparency, Democracy and Nuclear Power

Alliance sponsors art exhibit in conjunction with 4th anniversary of nuclear tragedy at Fukushima     WHAT:   REDACTED: This art exhibit transforms redacted documents and recently disclosed corporate email into visual art in order to questions just how much PG&E, Edison and the “regulatory” agencies are telling us about nuclear safety—and how much is […]

released emails between CPUC and PG&E regarding Diablo Canyon License Renewal

In February, 2015, PG&E released 65,000 emails detailing their communications with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) as part of a case involving the San Bruno gas pipeline explosion in 2010. In searching through the enormous volume of material, the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility (A4NR) has located a dozen that deal directly with the relicensing […]

Video Highlights of Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee Meeting, February 4, 2015

The following video excerpts from the day-long meeting of the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee highlight issues of concern to the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility. The clip below recaps discussion of Seismic issues: Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility attorney John Geesman informs the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee (DCISC) of a newly revealed and significantly revised […]

Tsunami threat to Diablo Canyon revisited….

The Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility has been actively involved in bringing to light a long-suppressed study of the tsunami threat to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.  Originally commissioned by the NRC for the 2003 licensing of the spent fuel storage installation at Diablo Canyon, its contents were redacted by the NRC for more than […]

California State Water Resources Control Board hearing on Once Through Cooling at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

On November 18, 2014, the California State Water Resource Control Board heard reports from its Subcommittee regarding the use of once through cooling at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, as well as comments from the public.  On behalf of PG&E, contractor Bechtel made a presentation on the options for building cooling towers at the facility. […]

Video of the Independent Peer Review Panel meetings # 7, # 8, #9, 10 & 11 at the CPUC

  On this page you will find links to view the videotapes of the meetings of the Independent Peer Review Panel (IPRP) formed by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to review the results of PG&E’s ratepayer funded seismic studies of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.   IPRP Meeting # 11, April 1, 2016 […]

Presentation of Dr. Douglas Hamilton to IPRP on 11/17/2014

The following, in both Powerpoint and PDF format, constitute the graphic presentation of Dr. Douglas Hamilton to the Independent Peer Review Panel (IPRP) regarding his analysis of PG&E’s Chapter 12 in their “Final Seismic Report.” As Powerpoint: DHH-IPRP presentation 111714   As a PDF file: DHH-IRPR 111714-V2 final            

NRC OVERSIGHT OF LICENSEE’S USE OF 10 CFR 50.59 PROCESS TO REPLACE SONGS’ STEAM GENERATORS (OIG CASE NO. 13-006)

THE NRC HAS RELEASE THEIR OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON THE NRC’S LACK OF OVERSIGHT OF THE 50.59 LICENSE AMENDMENT PROCESS WITH REGARD TO THE FAILED REPLACEMENT STEAM GENERATORS AT THE SAN ONOFRE (SONGS) NUCLEAR PLANT: NRC OIG 13-006 SONGS SG

A4NR files opening brief in CPUC case regarding PG&E’s “Final Seismic Study”

PG&E Subverted State Review of Diablo Canyon Seismic Studies and Squandered Ratepayer Money, According to A4NR Regulatory Filing The same attributes which have earned PG&E the distinction of being America’s only nuclear licensee facing criminal prosecution from the U.S. Department of Justice—including a leading charge of obstruction of justice—extend to the company’s conduct of the […]

Decision of CPUC in PG&E General Rate Case 12-11-009

PRESS RELEASE ON CPUC DECISION: 082614 PGE GRC PD-PR Here is the full Decision of the CPUC in the PG&E General Rate Case, 12-11-009: 082014 GRC PD -009 Here are only those excerpts from the decision that reflect the concerns of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility: 082014 GRC PD DCNPP Excerpts  

« Previous PageNext Page »